Theoretical Foundations of FinTech Regulation: Reconciling Innovation, Market Efficiency, and Financial Stability (FINANCE MONEY AND CREDIT)
What changed
Regulation No. 3513 superseded regulation No. 3268 from 2020
Payment Cybersecurity Standard p.7
Summary
- The study develops four theoretical hypotheses and corresponding assessment indicators to promote financial innovation while preserving stability.p.1
- The Adaptive Regulatory Reconciliation Framework (ARRF) integrates five interrelated dimensions into a continuous regulatory cycle.p.6
- Uzbekistan's financial sandbox regime operates under statutory authorization from Article 67¹ of the Law on the Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan.p.7
- Payment services and systems in Uzbekistan are legally governed by Law No. O‘RQ-578 of 1 November 2019.p.7
- Data protection and privacy requirements for financial institutions in Uzbekistan are established under Law No. O‘RQ-547 of 2 July 2019.p.7
- Central Bank Board regulation No. 3513, registered on 21 May 2024, established updated cybersecurity standards for payment system operators, superseding regulation No. 3268.p.7
Key insights
- Traditional financial regulatory frameworks were designed primarily around identifiable intermediaries and defined activities rather than distributed technology platforms.p.2
- Fintech business models distribute financial activities across banks, technology providers, and digital platforms, complicating the allocation of regulatory responsibilities.p.2
- The ARRF framework combines functional risk identification, proportional regulation, controlled experimentation, institutional coordination, and evidence-based adaptation.p.1
- Supervised testing in regulatory sandboxes offers valuable regulatory insights but results from limited trials do not guarantee safety at scale.p.3
- Concentrated dependencies on shared technology infrastructure and third-party service providers can introduce systemic risk transmission channels.p.3
- Effective sandbox experimentation requires clearly defined test parameters, including restrictions on participants, transaction volumes, duration, and risk exposure.p.5
- Proportional regulatory calibration aligns compliance demands with the nature and significance of identified financial risks.p.6
Topics and entities
Summary and figures generated from the document and checked automatically: every number shown appears on the cited page. The full document is available from the publisher. Publishers can request removal.