Investor Shelf

Distribution of ESG Practices Among the LuSE Sub-Industries Based on MSCI ESG Industry Materiality Map (Journal of Environment Climate and Ecology)

Save
Research paperJournal of Environment Climate and EcologyNovember 202613 pages20 min readKelvin Sinkamba, Jason MwanzaOriginal source
Key number
6.52 score
Mean ESG score of LuSE-listed firms p.1

Summary

  • The study uses a purposive sample of 12 firms with 60 firm-year observations on the Lusaka Securities Exchange.p.1
  • LuSE-listed firms have a mean ESG score of 6.52, with significant variation across sub-industries.p.1
  • Diversified real estate (5.02) and Reinsurance (5.43) are among the lowest overall ESG scores.p.10
  • Diversified Financial Services has the highest social score (3.69), while Diversified Real Estate Activities has the lowest (0.44).p.11
  • Industrial Conglomerates achieve the highest governance score (3.94) and Brewers the lowest (2.22).p.11

Key insights

  1. Governance is the top-performing ESG dimension, followed by social and then environmental performance.p.1
  2. ESG outcomes reflect industry-specific sustainability risks in line with the MSCI ESG industry materiality map.p.1
  3. Governance dimensions are treated as standard irrespective of sub-industry, while environmental and social material issues vary.p.5
  4. No comprehensive study had assessed ESG practice distribution across LuSE sub-industries before this paper.p.3

Pages

Funders mentioned

Topics and entities

Summary and figures generated from the document and checked automatically: every number shown appears on the cited page. Publishers can request removal.