Securities Study 2022: Hybrid Advisory Models Are the Future of Retail Investment Advice (Simon-Kucher)
SaveSummary
- Of the 1,071 consumers surveyed in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, 26 percent never used investment advice and don't plan to, while 49 percent make occasional or constant use of advisory services.§1
- 24 percent never sought advice before but would consider it in the future, as would 29 percent of investors under 30 years of age.§1
- 65 percent of customers with an affinity for advice would like proactive investment advice from their financial services provider.§2
- 49 percent of customers with an affinity for advice are dissatisfied with the digital user experience of their investment advice.§2
- 45 percent of customers with an affinity for advice and 64 percent of those with low affinity would like hybrid advisory approaches.§3
- 34 percent of customers would pay a premium purely for digital advice, while up to 55 percent would pay more for in-person advice.§3
- 82 percent of respondents see running costs as a decision-relevant criterion when selecting ETFs and funds, and 79 percent see order fees as key.§3
Key insights
- Hybrid advisory models are the future of retail investment advice services.§1
- Face-to-face advice is unscalable, so proactive advice is rarely offered in the retail sector today.§2
- Banks can learn from robo-advisors: ease of use, intuitive interfaces and a feeling of customization.§2
- Hybrid advice digitizes the existing advisory process so customers can theoretically go through it online without a personal advisor.§3
- 59 percent of customers would like to always be supported by the same advisor, while 41 percent could be helped by different advisors.§4
- Advisors who use hybrid advice solutions invest more than twice as much time in analyzing further customer needs and cross-selling.§4
Topics and entities
Summary and figures generated from the document and checked automatically: every number shown appears on the cited page. The full document is available from the publisher. Publishers can request removal.