Inverse Fintech: Nineteen Claims for Debate (International Journal of Advanced Academic Research)
SaveSummary
- The discussion note sets out nineteen statements about Inverse Fintech, ordered from least to most contestable.p.1
- Inverse Fintech is an asset-first approach to financial inclusion: a productive physical asset is placed with a household first and financial information is generated afterwards.p.1
- The statements fall into four tiers: descriptive, plausible premises, hypotheses to be tested and normative positions.p.1
- The concept is illustrated with a tested second-life solar panel placed with a household.p.2
- The Kenya pilot described in the research prospectus is designed to examine the Tier 3 hypotheses.p.3
Key insights
- The note is a discussion document that reports no empirical findings.p.1
- While the asset depreciates, the financial information it generates may appreciate in economic and institutional value.p.1
- A premise offered is that the scarcest resource in financial inclusion is verified information, not capital.p.3
- The value of verified information is said to grow with the number of institutions that trust it.p.3
- A hypothesis is that credit history is a by-product of productive ownership, not a precondition for inclusion.p.3
- The normative position is that credit-first finance charges the poor for their lack of history, while asset-first finance pays them in history.p.4
Funders mentioned
Topics and entities
Summary and figures generated from the document and checked automatically: every number shown appears on the cited page. The full document is available from the publisher. Publishers can request removal.