Investor Shelf

Institutional Investor Heterogeneity and Initial Public Offering Underpricing in China's Science and Technology Innovation Board: A Review (Journal of trends in financial and economics.)

Research paperJournal of trends in financial and economics.September 202616 pages24 min readMihong ZhangOriginal source
Key number
35%-50%
Public information explanation of IPO underpricing p.7
What changed
March 2001 to 2005
A-share approval system implementation period p.7

Summary

  • Bushee established a systematic classification of institutional investors using 3 types of indicators and 9 constructed variables.p.2
  • Stable institutional investors reduced equity costs in Chinese high-tech firms from 2008 to 2017 more effectively than transactional investors.p.3
  • Analysis of registration statements from 193 companies listed on the STAR Market from June 13, 2019, to January 31, 2021, revealed that redundant disclosures exacerbate underpricing.p.4
  • A synthesis of 31 references evaluated Chinese IPO pricing efficiency across historical regulatory transformations.p.6
  • Publicly available information accounts for only 35%-50% of observed IPO underpricing.p.7
  • Empirical bidding data across 380 Chinese IPOs indicates that higher investor sentiment drives institutional participants to raise bid prices.p.7
  • An examination of 2955 Chinese A-share listed stocks from 2003 to 2020 demonstrated that positive investor sentiment affects IPO underpricing via market turnover rate.p.9

Key insights

  1. Transaction-oriented institutional investors exert a more pronounced impact on IPO underpricing than long-term stable investors.p.1
  2. Pressure-resistant investors significantly enhance internal control effectiveness and firm investment efficiency compared to pressure-sensitive investors.p.3
  3. Registration-based IPO systems reduce post-listing speculation by accelerating the release of investor sentiment.p.4
  4. Patent ownership produces a strong signaling effect that effectively mitigates IPO underpricing for innovation-focused companies.p.5
  5. Registration system reforms enhance IPO pricing efficiency by elevating corporate disclosure quality and diminishing information asymmetry.p.6
  6. Low-price collusion among inquiry objects occurs when regulatory enforcement defaults to lenient supervisory conditions.p.7
  7. Removing first-day price fluctuation limits and introducing margin trading on the STAR Market curbs speculative sentiment.p.9

Pages

Topics and entities

Summary and figures generated from the document and checked automatically: every number shown appears on the cited page. Publishers can request removal.