Biodiversity Credits and Carbon Markets as Financing Mechanisms for Environmental Sustainability in Nigeria: A Policy and Research Review (Academic research)
SaveSummary
- Nigeria's forest area declined from approximately 26.5 million hectares in 1990 to 21.6 million hectares in 2020.p.2
- Global Forest Watch-derived figures put 2023 natural forest loss at 81,200 hectares, with emissions of 54.6 million tonnes of CO2.p.2
- The global voluntary biodiversity credit market was only about US$8 million in 2023, projected to reach roughly US$2 billion by 2030 and US$69 billion by 2050.p.3
- Net zero by 2060 is estimated to require approximately US$1.9 trillion in cumulative investment, of which at least US$410 billion above business-as-usual spending.p.5
- Government estimates of the carbon market's potential value by 2030 range from roughly US$736 million to US$2.5 billion.p.5
- The revised NBSAP for 2025–2030 is built around 23 national targets mapped to the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.p.7
Key insights
- An earlier BloombergNEF estimate of up to US$160 billion by 2030 illustrates the wide uncertainty around biodiversity credit projections.p.3
- Nigeria does not yet have an operational biodiversity credit scheme, but has built policy foundations for one.p.7
- Five states alone accounted for 54% of Nigeria's total tree-cover loss between 2001 and 2020.p.2
- The Energy Transition Plan targets five sectors that together account for approximately 65% of national greenhouse gas emissions.p.5
- Evidence from the Cross River REDD+ programme is mixed, with uneven benefits and calls for stronger consent and benefit-sharing.p.6
- Key barriers include limited MRV capacity, no universal biodiversity metric and fragmented governance between federal bodies.p.9
- The window for building these mechanisms before further irreversible ecological loss is narrowing.p.10
Pages
Funders mentioned
Topics and entities
Summary and figures generated from the document and checked automatically: every number shown appears on the cited page. Publishers can request removal.